top of page

Crisis of Neutrality

Writer's picture: Caroline EstesCaroline Estes

The echoes of 1968 still resonate today as the fight for civil rights continues to evolve. Past legislative victories, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the ADA of 1990, marked undeniable progress. Yet, they did not extinguish the embers of systemic inequality. Between 1968 and 2025, these embers flared into new challenges requiring renewed commitment and vigilance.


Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, heralded as steps toward rectifying historical injustices, are now under attack. Critics frame these programs as divisive, with bans on Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools and the dismantling of DEI offices becoming widespread. This backlash, cloaked in the rhetoric of "neutrality," seeks to suppress efforts that aim to expose and address systemic racism. Ersula Ore's poignant exploration of lynching, both historical and contemporary, illustrates how racial violence has adapted rather than disappeared. Today, lynching manifests in police brutality, mass incarceration, and economic disenfranchisement. These are modern tools of oppression that perpetuate racial inequality.


Movements like Black Lives Matter draw strength from the herstory of activists like Alicia Garza and countless others who have fought tirelessly for justice. These movements are the latest iterations of a struggle that spans centuries, demonstrating that the fight for equity is both a marathon and a relay. Each generation carries the baton forward, often against fierce resistance, but always with an eye toward a more just future.


The murders of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd serve as tragic reminders of the enduring presence of racial violence. These modern lynchings underscore the fact that progress is not guaranteed. Legislative measures like the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act have been introduced, but their passage remains uncertain in the face of political polarization. Meanwhile, gerrymandering and voter suppression laws threaten to erode the democratic foundations necessary for meaningful change.


Socially, the narrative of "colorblindness" has been weaponized to undermine the recognition of systemic inequities. This rhetoric ignores the lived experiences of marginalized communities and perpetuates a status quo that benefits those in power. Nevertheless, as history has shown, silence is complicity. It is imperative to confront these issues head-on, using tools like storytelling, activism, and policy advocacy to dismantle the structures of oppression.


As we reflect on the parallels between 1968 and 2025, it becomes clear that the struggle for civil rights is far from over. The lessons of the past remind us that progress requires both persistence and adaptability. It is not enough to commemorate the civil rights movement's victories; we must actively work to protect and expand them. The road ahead is challenging, but the pursuit of justice demands that we keep marching, advocating, and believing in the possibility of a more equitable future.



5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

©2020- 2025 Caroline Estes. Created by Divine Designs by Caroline ©2014

 

bottom of page